Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
7630
Flash duration on a map (sec)
02:04s00:39s
Deagle kills on a map
91.6964
Deagle damage (avg/round)
20.45.4
Assists on a map
15.94.3517
Damage (total/round)
38873
Player score (round)
37881012
Player score (round)
41461012
Shots (total/round)
8516
Shots (total/round)
8516
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
75%
Train
67%
Overpass
50%
Nuke
22%
Inferno
17%
Dust II
15%
Vertigo
8%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
75%
16
5
Train
0%
0
33
Overpass
50%
6
10
Nuke
45%
20
3
Inferno
50%
16
8
Dust II
65%
20
0
Vertigo
42%
12
13
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
1
6
Train
67%
3
2
Overpass
0%
1
6
Nuke
67%
6
5
Inferno
33%
9
2
Dust II
50%
6
3
Vertigo
50%
6
0
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of BIG vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between BIG and MIBR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Nuke, Dust II, Vertigo, and victory was secured by BIG. The MVP of this match was XANTARES.
BIG analytics
The team BIG secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Vertigo. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BIG were XANTARES contributed 73 kills and tabseN contributed 64 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 32405 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BIG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MIBR were vsm contributed 74 kills and kNgV- contributed 61 kills. 31119 of total damage by MIBR could not prevent BIG from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
Comments