eSuba Scoreboard Vertigo (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

8

1

+9

104

4:1

5

0

8.6

+50%

14

7

0

+7

97

2:2

3

0

7.1

+32%

13

9

1

+4

90

2:3

2

0

7.0

+14%

9

6

1

+3

72

1:0

2

0

6.3

+6%

10

7

3

+3

72

0:1

3

1

6.3

+25%

Total

63

37

6

+26

435

9:7

15

1

7.1

+25%

BLUEJAYS Scoreboard Vertigo (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

9

12

2

-3

50

2:1

2

0

5.3

-16%

8

11

0

-3

59

1:0

1

0

5.2

-17%

8

12

3

-4

80

0:4

2

0

5.1

-5%

8

14

2

-6

52

3:3

3

0

4.9

-26%

4

14

2

-10

45

1:1

0

0

4.0

-46%

Total

37

63

9

-26

286

7:9

8

0

4.9

-22%

Teams advantage Vertigo (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of eSuba vs BLUEJAYS by the Bo3.gg Team

BLUEJAYS on Vertigo Analysis

BLUEJAYS demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 5 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for BLUEJAYS on Vertigo were dan1, who contributed 9 kills, and aidKiT, who added 8 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 4580 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Vertigo, BLUEJAYS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


eSuba on Vertigo Analysis

Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for eSuba, as they managed to secure 11 out of 16 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for eSuba on Vertigo included sAvana1, who contributed 17 kills, and Pechyn, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6965 total damage, eSuba couldn't prevent BLUEJAYS from securing victory on Vertigo


On the defensive side of Vertigo, eSuba struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date