Fluxo Scoreboard Dust II (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

10

18

4

-8

66

2:2

2

0

5.1

-27%

7

16

1

-9

44

3:5

0

0

4.3

-37%

7

16

3

-9

44

0:0

0

0

4.3

-37%

8

16

0

-8

41

1:3

2

0

4.1

-42%

4

17

0

-13

23

0:4

1

0

3.0

-58%

Total

36

83

8

-47

218

6:14

5

0

4.2

-40%

G2 Scoreboard Dust II (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

8

4

+16

127

3:0

6

0

8.8

+58%

21

7

5

+14

103

3:1

4

0

8.1

+33%

14

7

8

+7

84

5:3

3

0

7.0

+15%

13

10

3

+3

68

2:2

5

0

5.9

+9%

11

4

3

+7

49

1:0

2

0

5.8

+19%

Total

83

36

23

+47

430

14:6

20

0

7.1

+27%

Teams advantage Dust II (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Fluxo vs G2 by the Bo3.gg Team

G2 on Dust II Analysis

G2 demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 16 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for G2 on Dust II were huNter, who contributed 24 kills, and NiKo, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 8608 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Dust II, G2 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Fluxo on Dust II Analysis

Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for Fluxo, as they managed to secure 4 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Fluxo on Dust II included vsm, who contributed 10 kills, and felps, who added 7 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4357 total damage, Fluxo couldn't prevent G2 from securing victory on Dust II


On the defensive side of Dust II, Fluxo struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date