G2 Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

28

18

5

+10

99

3:1

8

0

7.6

+18%

24

18

8

+6

103

4:1

5

0

7.3

+5%

23

20

1

+3

75

5:2

6

1

6.7

+14%

18

24

1

-6

51

2:6

4

0

4.9

-30%

12

20

3

-8

47

1:5

3

2

4.7

-26%

Total

105

100

18

+5

374

15:15

26

3

6.2

-4%

fnatic Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

36

22

2

+14

116

5:4

11

0

8.2

+41%

18

23

3

-5

66

4:3

3

0

5.7

-11%

16

20

8

-4

73

0:3

3

1

5.5

-4%

14

19

5

-5

57

4:2

3

0

5.3

-21%

15

21

4

-6

51

2:3

2

0

5.1

-20%

Total

99

105

22

-6

363

15:15

22

1

6.0

-3%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of G2 vs fnatic by the Bo3.gg Team

G2 on Inferno Analysis

G2 demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for G2 on Inferno were huNter, who contributed 28 kills, and NiKo, who added 24 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 11210 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, G2 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


fnatic on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for fnatic, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for fnatic on Inferno included poizon, who contributed 36 kills, and Peppzor, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10885 total damage, fnatic couldn't prevent G2 from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, fnatic struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date