0 Kommentare
Teams Vorteil
LeistungenMatch
Rekord/Zeit/Karte
Wert/D
Setzen durch
Rivael
Molotov Schaden (avg/round)
6.12
Spieler Punktzahl (round)
37501011
Schüsse (total/round)
9716
Multi-Tötungen x-
4
Kupplung (opponents)
2
Teammitglied tötet
1
Molotov Schaden (total/round)
10323.8
HE Schaden (total/round)
20726.4
Flash Dauer pro Runde (sec)
00:19s00:05s
Schnelle Bombenanlage (sec)
00:27s01:26s
Historisch Karten Gewinnrate Letzte 6 Monate
Inferno
48%
Mirage
24%
Vertigo
20%
Anubis
15%
Ancient
13%
Overpass
7%
Nuke
2%
Letzte 5 Karten
Inferno
48%
23
4
Mirage
47%
15
10
Vertigo
31%
16
18
Anubis
50%
14
20
Ancient
50%
20
7
Overpass
50%
18
5
Nuke
33%
3
31
Letzte 5 Karten
Inferno
0%
0
45
Mirage
71%
14
3
Vertigo
11%
9
18
Anubis
65%
17
4
Ancient
63%
19
6
Overpass
57%
7
26
Nuke
35%
17
9
Letzte Ergebnisse
Kopf an Kopf
Vergangene Spiele
- wwlwl
- llwww
Info
Match analysis of EYEBALLERS vs PERA by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between EYEBALLERS and PERA, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Overpass, Anubis, and victory was secured by PERA. The MVP of this match was DGL.
PERA analytics
The team PERA secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass, Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for PERA were DGL contributed 44 kills and Aaron contributed 37 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19899 overall damage.
On the defensive side, PERA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
EYEBALLERS analytics
The team EYEBALLERS managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for EYEBALLERS were JW contributed 39 kills and HEAP contributed 31 kills. 17451 of total damage by EYEBALLERS could not prevent PERA from securing the victory
On the defensive side, EYEBALLERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
Kommentare