MASONIC Tableau des résultats Inferno (M0)

+/-

SCORES DES RONDS

18

6

6

+12

97

1:1

4

0

7.9

+41%

15

8

1

+7

88

1:0

3

0

7.3

+31%

16

7

3

+9

83

1:3

6

0

6.7

+28%

13

10

6

+3

73

4:3

3

0

6.7

+8%

10

9

6

+1

73

3:2

3

0

6.4

+2%

Total

72

40

22

+32

415

10:9

19

0

7.0

+22%

JANO Tableau des résultats Inferno (M0)

+/-

SCORES DES RONDS

11

14

2

-3

68

4:1

2

0

5.8

-17%

10

13

3

-3

42

2:2

3

0

4.9

-19%

8

12

1

-4

45

1:1

3

0

4.7

-20%

6

18

5

-12

59

2:5

0

0

4.0

-37%

5

15

0

-10

47

0:1

0

0

3.9

-32%

Total

40

72

11

-32

260

9:10

8

0

4.7

-25%

avantage aux équipes Inferno (M0)
Informations
Map Analysis of MASONIC vs JANO by the Bo3.gg Team

MASONIC on Inferno Analysis

MASONIC demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for MASONIC on Inferno were j3nsyy, who contributed 18 kills, and notaN, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7876 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, MASONIC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


JANO on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for JANO, as they managed to secure 3 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for JANO on Inferno included allu, who contributed 11 kills, and ZOREE, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4946 total damage, JANO couldn't prevent MASONIC from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, JANO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Commentaires
Par date