9z Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

20

1

+4

76

3:6

8

0

6.4

+25%

18

17

8

+1

77

4:0

5

0

6.4

-3%

19

20

2

-1

70

5:3

5

0

6.0

-11%

15

19

7

-4

73

3:2

2

0

5.7

-6%

14

18

3

-4

48

0:2

4

0

4.8

-21%

Total

90

94

21

-4

345

15:13

24

0

5.9

-3%

Sharks Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

26

17

6

+9

100

3:3

7

0

7.3

+25%

23

15

0

+8

77

2:3

7

1

6.7

+12%

16

18

6

-2

67

4:3

4

0

5.8

-14%

15

18

4

-3

67

0:1

2

0

5.4

-11%

14

22

4

-8

62

4:5

3

0

5.2

-14%

Total

94

90

20

+4

372

13:15

23

1

6.1

-1%

Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of 9z vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team

Sharks on Anubis Analysis

Sharks demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Sharks on Anubis were chay, who contributed 26 kills, and Gafolo, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 10406 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


9z on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for 9z, as they managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for 9z on Anubis included Buda, who contributed 24 kills, and try, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9654 total damage, 9z couldn't prevent Sharks from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, 9z struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date