AGO Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

13

3

+8

75

4:2

5

1

7.1

+27%

22

18

4

+4

85

6:2

7

0

6.9

+4%

15

15

7

0

81

2:1

3

0

6.2

+6%

16

15

7

+1

81

2:3

5

1

6.1

+3%

15

19

5

-4

56

2:2

2

0

5.2

-21%

Total

89

80

26

+9

379

16:10

22

2

6.3

+4%

AVE Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

18

7

-1

83

3:4

4

1

6.3

+6%

19

19

1

0

74

2:3

3

1

6.2

+9%

18

17

4

+1

71

3:4

6

0

5.9

-1%

16

19

3

-3

69

1:2

3

0

5.7

-12%

10

17

2

-7

49

1:3

1

0

4.4

-26%

Total

80

90

17

-10

346

10:16

17

2

5.7

-5%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of AGO vs AVE by the Bo3.gg Team

AGO on Inferno Analysis

AGO demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for AGO on Inferno were Furlan, who contributed 21 kills, and snatchie, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9853 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, AGO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


AVE on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for AVE, as they managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for AVE on Inferno included sugaR, who contributed 17 kills, and svyat, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8997 total damage, AVE couldn't prevent AGO from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, AVE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date