AGO Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

16

18

4

-2

99

4:4

4

0

6.4

+4%

19

19

3

0

72

2:3

6

0

5.9

+9%

11

15

3

-4

59

1:1

2

0

5.1

-14%

13

19

2

-6

52

4:2

2

0

5.1

-30%

10

18

2

-8

55

0:2

2

0

4.4

-30%

Total

69

89

14

-20

337

11:12

16

0

5.4

-12%

Lyngby Vikings Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

25

13

4

+12

110

5:0

7

1

8.6

+39%

26

16

3

+10

112

4:5

7

1

8.2

+42%

16

13

4

+3

71

1:1

5

1

6.3

+5%

10

12

4

-2

51

1:0

2

0

5.4

-18%

12

15

6

-3

62

1:5

3

1

5.4

-7%

Total

89

69

21

+20

405

12:11

24

4

6.8

+12%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of AGO vs Lyngby Vikings by the Bo3.gg Team

Lyngby Vikings on Inferno Analysis

Lyngby Vikings demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Lyngby Vikings on Inferno were WolfY, who contributed 25 kills, and FASHR, who added 26 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9312 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Lyngby Vikings held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


AGO on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for AGO, as they managed to secure 7 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for AGO on Inferno included F1KU, who contributed 16 kills, and Furlan, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7760 total damage, AGO couldn't prevent Lyngby Vikings from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, AGO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date