AGO Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

8

2

+16

95

5:1

6

0

8.1

+35%

24

8

1

+16

95

0:3

7

0

7.4

+49%

19

13

1

+6

90

3:0

4

0

6.9

+14%

11

11

9

0

87

3:1

2

0

6.1

+14%

16

13

3

+3

67

3:3

5

0

5.6

+2%

Total

94

53

16

+41

435

14:8

24

0

6.8

+23%

SJ Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

11

17

5

-6

61

2:2

3

1

5.6

-20%

13

19

2

-6

77

0:2

3

0

5.3

-10%

13

20

2

-7

56

3:5

3

0

5.0

-20%

8

20

2

-12

49

3:1

1

0

4.7

-24%

6

18

4

-12

38

0:4

0

0

3.5

-41%

Total

51

94

15

-43

280

8:14

10

1

4.8

-23%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of AGO vs SJ by the Bo3.gg Team

AGO on Inferno Analysis

AGO demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for AGO on Inferno were snatchie, who contributed 24 kills, and leman, who added 24 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9570 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, AGO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


SJ on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for SJ, as they managed to secure 6 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for SJ on Inferno included Jelo, who contributed 11 kills, and Jimpphat, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6164 total damage, SJ couldn't prevent AGO from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, SJ struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date