ARCRED Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

5

0

1

+5

188

1:0

2

0

10.0

+135%

2

0

0

+2

76

1:0

0

0

7.1

+31%

2

0

0

+2

59

0:0

0

0

6.0

+27%

1

0

0

+1

10

0:0

0

0

4.3

-11%

0

0

0

0

0

0:0

0

0

3.4

-33%

Total

10

0

1

+10

333

2:0

2

0

6.2

+30%

1WIN Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

0

2

0

-2

29

0:0

0

0

3.3

-45%

0

2

0

-2

28

0:0

0

0

3.3

-56%

0

2

0

-2

4

0:0

0

0

2.7

-63%

0

2

0

-2

0

0:0

0

0

2.6

-64%

0

2

0

-2

0

0:2

0

0

1.3

-66%

Total

0

10

0

-10

60

0:2

0

0

2.6

-59%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of ARCRED vs 1WIN by the Bo3.gg Team

ARCRED on Inferno Analysis

ARCRED demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 3 out of 3 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for ARCRED on Inferno were 1NVISIBLE, who contributed 5 kills, and DSSj, who added 2 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 1000 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, ARCRED held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


1WIN on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for 1WIN, as they managed to secure 0 out of 3 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for 1WIN on Inferno included Oz1k, who contributed 0 kills, and latt1kk, who added 0 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 181 total damage, 1WIN couldn't prevent ARCRED from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, 1WIN struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date