ARCTIC Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

16

10

+7

94

4:3

6

1

7.2

+16%

18

22

2

-4

72

4:2

5

0

6.0

-12%

21

23

7

-2

69

3:3

6

0

5.9

-2%

18

21

5

-3

71

3:5

5

0

5.7

-5%

10

21

5

-11

37

1:2

2

0

4.3

-31%

Total

90

103

29

-13

344

15:15

24

1

5.8

-7%

Sharks Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

29

15

4

+14

100

3:2

9

0

7.5

+34%

24

22

4

+2

88

6:3

6

0

6.9

+8%

19

17

1

+2

68

3:2

6

0

6.0

-6%

18

21

3

-3

62

2:5

4

0

5.5

-4%

12

18

4

-6

59

1:3

2

0

5.0

-18%

Total

102

93

16

+9

376

15:15

27

0

6.2

+3%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of ARCTIC vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team

Sharks on Inferno Analysis

Sharks demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Sharks on Inferno were Gafolo, who contributed 29 kills, and chay, who added 24 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 11291 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


ARCTIC on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for ARCTIC, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for ARCTIC on Inferno included keiz, who contributed 23 kills, and ponter, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10326 total damage, ARCTIC couldn't prevent Sharks from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, ARCTIC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date