Astralis Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

15

7

+3

82

2:3

6

1

6.3

-4%

19

22

5

-3

72

3:4

5

0

5.6

+1%

19

20

0

-1

67

5:6

5

0

5.5

-17%

14

18

6

-4

59

1:3

3

0

5.1

-10%

11

21

3

-10

47

1:1

0

0

4.7

-29%

Total

81

96

21

-15

328

12:17

19

1

5.4

-12%

GODSENT Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

22

18

5

+4

80

4:1

6

1

7.0

+15%

22

13

2

+9

84

4:5

4

1

6.8

+15%

22

18

3

+4

71

3:4

5

0

6.3

+5%

16

19

6

-3

70

5:1

4

0

6.0

-6%

12

15

3

-3

49

1:1

3

0

5.0

-21%

Total

94

83

19

+11

354

17:12

22

2

6.2

+2%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Astralis vs GODSENT by the Bo3.gg Team

GODSENT on Inferno Analysis

GODSENT demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for GODSENT on Inferno were ztr, who contributed 22 kills, and draken, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10255 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, GODSENT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Astralis on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Astralis, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Astralis on Inferno included blameF, who contributed 18 kills, and gla1ve, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9504 total damage, Astralis couldn't prevent GODSENT from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Astralis struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date