Aurora Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

20

2

+1

84

6:2

6

0

6.8

+14%

16

17

5

-1

71

3:6

5

0

5.6

-11%

14

16

4

-2

58

0:0

3

1

5.5

-17%

17

19

4

-2

56

2:2

6

0

5.5

-11%

11

17

3

-6

51

2:4

3

0

4.7

-23%

Total

79

89

18

-10

320

13:14

23

1

5.6

-9%

1WIN Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

25

16

5

+9

93

6:2

9

0

7.5

+13%

20

14

4

+6

74

0:2

4

1

6.3

+8%

18

15

3

+3

64

2:3

3

0

5.5

+4%

12

20

8

-8

65

4:4

3

1

5.4

-14%

14

14

5

0

56

2:2

3

1

5.3

-13%

Total

89

79

25

+10

351

14:13

22

3

6.0

0%

Teams advantage Nuke (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Aurora vs 1WIN by the Bo3.gg Team

1WIN on Nuke Analysis

1WIN demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for 1WIN on Nuke were deko, who contributed 25 kills, and Forester, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 9838 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, 1WIN held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Aurora on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for Aurora, as they managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Aurora on Nuke included Lack1, who contributed 21 kills, and KENSI, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8957 total damage, Aurora couldn't prevent 1WIN from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, Aurora struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date