0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:27s01:30s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:35s01:30s
Eco wins full buy
1
Shots (total/round)
9316
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
HE damage (total/round)
10426.8
HE damage (total/round)
9826.8
HE damage (total/round)
12526.8
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
62%
Nuke
50%
Inferno
33%
Mirage
18%
Vertigo
10%
Ancient
7%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
62%
13
5
Nuke
50%
2
27
Inferno
42%
24
1
Mirage
68%
25
3
Vertigo
57%
7
14
Ancient
53%
15
11
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
1
6
Nuke
0%
0
7
Inferno
75%
4
3
Mirage
50%
8
0
Vertigo
67%
3
1
Ancient
60%
10
0
Info
Match analysis of AVANGAR vs ESTOWNIA by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between AVANGAR and ESTOWNIA, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Ancient, Mirage, and victory was secured by ESTOWNIA. The MVP of this match was fejtZ.
ESTOWNIA analytics
The team ESTOWNIA secured 35 out of 65 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Mirage. They also successfully set 10 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ESTOWNIA were fejtZ contributed 59 kills and Wahtzz contributed 48 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 24764 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ESTOWNIA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 16 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
AVANGAR analytics
The team AVANGAR managed to secure 30 out of 65 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for AVANGAR were icem4N contributed 59 kills and icy contributed 50 kills. 26062 of total damage by AVANGAR could not prevent ESTOWNIA from securing the victory
On the defensive side, AVANGAR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
Comments