AVANGAR Scoreboard Dust II (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

16

18

6

-2

81

1:3

6

1

6.4

0%

12

18

10

-6

88

1:3

4

0

5.6

-16%

13

17

2

-4

54

3:2

2

0

5.3

-19%

13

17

3

-4

60

1:5

3

0

5.0

-8%

11

20

6

-9

50

1:3

1

0

4.7

-33%

Total

65

90

27

-25

333

7:16

16

1

5.4

-15%

MAD Lions Scoreboard Dust II (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

13

3

+10

110

5:0

6

0

8.1

+37%

19

14

15

+5

102

5:3

5

0

7.2

+24%

18

13

3

+5

71

3:1

5

0

6.6

+7%

15

12

3

+3

66

1:1

3

2

6.2

+6%

14

13

4

+1

61

2:2

4

0

6.1

+1%

Total

89

65

28

+24

410

16:7

23

2

6.8

+15%

Teams advantage Dust II (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of AVANGAR vs MAD Lions by the Bo3.gg Team

MAD Lions on Dust II Analysis

MAD Lions demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 16 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for MAD Lions on Dust II were MICHU, who contributed 23 kills, and TMB, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 9434 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Dust II, MAD Lions held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


AVANGAR on Dust II Analysis

Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for AVANGAR, as they managed to secure 7 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for AVANGAR on Dust II included kade0, who contributed 16 kills, and FinigaN, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7653 total damage, AVANGAR couldn't prevent MAD Lions from securing victory on Dust II


On the defensive side of Dust II, AVANGAR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date