AVEZ Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

13

16

1

-3

73

4:2

4

0

6.0

-2%

12

17

5

-5

82

1:0

3

1

5.9

+5%

9

16

3

-7

62

0:0

3

0

4.9

-16%

9

18

0

-9

59

4:3

1

0

4.8

-22%

8

16

3

-8

58

1:4

2

0

4.5

-8%

Total

51

83

12

-32

334

10:9

13

1

5.2

-9%

Nemiga Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

9

3

+17

116

3:0

7

0

9.2

+57%

13

10

4

+3

69

0:1

3

3

7.0

+6%

12

12

9

0

88

4:1

1

0

7.0

+12%

16

10

2

+6

85

0:0

6

0

6.8

+16%

15

11

3

+4

85

2:8

6

0

6.4

+18%

Total

82

52

21

+30

443

9:10

23

3

7.3

+22%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of AVEZ vs Nemiga by the Bo3.gg Team

Nemiga on Inferno Analysis

Nemiga demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Nemiga on Inferno were iDISBALANCE, who contributed 26 kills, and 1eeR, who added 13 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8417 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Nemiga held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


AVEZ on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for AVEZ, as they managed to secure 3 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for AVEZ on Inferno included SaMey, who contributed 13 kills, and fanatyk, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6339 total damage, AVEZ couldn't prevent Nemiga from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, AVEZ struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date