B8 Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

23

7

3

+16

109

3:0

7

0

8.8

+49%

15

11

5

+4

81

2:2

3

1

6.9

+11%

15

11

9

+4

84

2:2

3

0

6.7

+31%

14

9

7

+5

91

0:2

4

0

6.5

+18%

12

9

11

+3

78

2:3

2

0

6.1

+14%

Total

79

47

35

+32

443

9:9

19

1

7.0

+25%

Zero Tenacity Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

14

15

1

-1

78

0:0

3

1

6.6

0%

10

16

7

-6

86

3:4

2

0

5.6

-16%

10

14

2

-4

55

2:2

3

0

5.3

-24%

7

17

3

-10

53

3:1

1

0

5.0

-35%

6

17

0

-11

42

1:2

1

0

4.3

-42%

Total

47

79

13

-32

314

9:9

10

1

5.4

-23%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of B8 vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team

B8 on Inferno Analysis

B8 demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for B8 on Inferno were npl, who contributed 23 kills, and headtr1ck, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7979 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, B8 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Zero Tenacity on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Inferno included Cjoffo, who contributed 14 kills, and nEMANHA, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5650 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent B8 from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date