BIG Scoreboard Nuke (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

17

4

+7

69

4:1

6

1

6.8

+5%

18

19

8

-1

76

3:5

4

1

6.1

-3%

21

19

1

+2

67

3:4

6

0

6.0

+2%

14

21

4

-7

56

1:2

2

0

5.0

-20%

11

22

3

-11

43

1:6

2

0

4.2

-34%

Total

88

98

20

-10

311

12:18

20

2

5.6

-10%

MIBR Scoreboard Nuke (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

30

17

5

+13

95

5:0

7

1

7.7

+25%

23

17

3

+6

92

5:1

3

0

7.1

+17%

18

20

6

-2

66

3:3

5

0

5.9

-5%

12

17

3

-5

55

4:4

2

0

5.1

-22%

14

18

3

-4

48

1:4

2

0

4.8

-21%

Total

97

89

20

+8

356

18:12

19

1

6.1

-1%

Teams advantage Nuke (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of BIG vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team

MIBR on Nuke Analysis

MIBR demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for MIBR on Nuke were HEN1, who contributed 30 kills, and exit, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 10693 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


BIG on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for BIG, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for BIG on Nuke included syrsoN, who contributed 24 kills, and tabseN, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9324 total damage, BIG couldn't prevent MIBR from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, BIG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date