BIG Scoreboard Dust II (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

27

17

6

+10

100

3:4

7

1

7.4

+20%

21

16

6

+5

67

6:1

4

0

6.6

+2%

19

20

6

-1

68

5:1

6

1

6.3

-10%

19

23

3

-4

73

1:5

5

0

5.6

-7%

10

23

4

-13

54

2:2

1

0

4.7

-24%

Total

96

99

25

-3

362

17:13

23

2

6.1

-4%

OG Scoreboard Dust II (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

25

17

6

+8

92

2:2

5

1

7.0

+23%

24

22

3

+2

88

3:4

6

0

6.5

+20%

18

18

5

0

74

1:2

5

1

6.1

-2%

17

19

4

-2

59

5:1

2

0

5.8

-11%

15

20

4

-5

54

2:8

3

0

4.9

-17%

Total

99

96

22

+3

367

13:17

21

2

6.1

+3%

Teams advantage Dust II (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of BIG vs OG by the Bo3.gg Team

BIG on Dust II Analysis

BIG demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for BIG on Dust II were tabseN, who contributed 27 kills, and syrsoN, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 10873 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Dust II, BIG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


OG on Dust II Analysis

Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for OG, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for OG on Dust II included Aleksib, who contributed 25 kills, and NBK-, who added 24 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10998 total damage, OG couldn't prevent BIG from securing victory on Dust II


On the defensive side of Dust II, OG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date