BIG Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

17

3

+7

93

2:1

8

0

7.1

+18%

24

18

1

+6

102

1:1

7

0

7.1

+18%

15

19

3

-4

60

4:6

3

0

5.3

-10%

7

23

11

-16

62

1:7

0

0

4.0

-35%

8

18

3

-10

28

0:3

1

0

3.6

-37%

Total

78

95

21

-17

346

8:18

19

0

5.4

-9%

OG Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

13

6

+13

115

3:0

7

1

8.6

+37%

19

19

7

0

85

7:1

4

0

6.9

+10%

19

16

3

+3

69

1:1

6

0

6.1

+3%

17

14

1

+3

56

4:1

5

0

6.1

-7%

13

17

7

-4

59

3:5

2

0

5.2

-13%

Total

94

79

24

+15

384

18:8

24

1

6.6

+6%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of BIG vs OG by the Bo3.gg Team

OG on Inferno Analysis

OG demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for OG on Inferno were valde, who contributed 26 kills, and NBK-, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9991 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, OG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


BIG on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for BIG, as they managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for BIG on Inferno included syrsoN, who contributed 24 kills, and XANTARES, who added 24 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8996 total damage, BIG couldn't prevent OG from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, BIG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date