BIG Scoreboard Dust II (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

25

9

1

+16

90

2:1

6

2

7.8

+44%

23

14

6

+9

106

5:3

6

0

7.5

+25%

18

14

7

+4

87

2:1

6

0

7.0

+7%

15

13

4

+2

61

2:1

5

0

5.8

+5%

12

16

9

-4

62

3:5

3

0

5.3

-16%

Total

93

66

27

+27

406

14:11

26

2

6.7

+13%

OG Scoreboard Dust II (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

19

2

-2

79

7:3

3

0

6.4

+2%

16

16

3

0

73

0:0

3

0

6.0

-6%

16

20

0

-4

66

0:2

4

0

5.4

-13%

11

20

4

-9

61

3:4

4

0

4.8

-28%

6

19

3

-13

43

1:5

1

0

3.6

-39%

Total

66

94

12

-28

321

11:14

15

0

5.2

-17%

Teams advantage Dust II (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of BIG vs OG by the Bo3.gg Team

BIG on Dust II Analysis

BIG demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for BIG on Dust II were k1to, who contributed 25 kills, and tabseN, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 10140 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Dust II, BIG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


OG on Dust II Analysis

Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for OG, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for OG on Dust II included niko, who contributed 17 kills, and valde, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8034 total damage, OG couldn't prevent BIG from securing victory on Dust II


On the defensive side of Dust II, OG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date