BIG Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

32

21

4

+11

82

8:2

10

2

7.7

+21%

27

23

6

+4

93

4:3

5

1

6.9

+14%

22

23

8

-1

71

2:4

5

1

5.9

-7%

21

19

4

+2

63

2:2

6

0

5.8

-9%

18

24

8

-6

64

2:6

3

0

5.3

-15%

Total

120

110

30

+10

373

18:17

29

4

6.3

+1%

SAW Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

29

22

5

+7

87

6:3

9

0

6.9

+11%

29

30

5

-1

95

6:3

9

0

6.8

+7%

19

25

3

-6

66

1:7

6

1

5.3

-8%

17

24

3

-7

66

3:3

1

0

5.3

-14%

15

20

2

-5

55

1:2

1

1

5.1

-15%

Total

109

121

18

-12

370

17:18

26

2

5.9

-4%

Teams advantage Anubis (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of BIG vs SAW by the Bo3.gg Team

BIG on Anubis Analysis

BIG demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 19 out of 35 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for BIG on Anubis were mantuu, who contributed 32 kills, and tabseN, who added 27 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 13040 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, BIG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


SAW on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for SAW, as they managed to secure 16 out of 35 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for SAW on Anubis included story, who contributed 29 kills, and ewjerkz, who added 29 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 12962 total damage, SAW couldn't prevent BIG from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, SAW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date