BIG Scoreboard Vertigo (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

10

6

+9

115

4:1

6

0

8.3

+39%

16

7

5

+9

85

2:2

5

0

7.1

+23%

17

11

5

+6

87

1:3

5

0

6.8

+24%

12

8

5

+4

81

1:1

2

0

6.4

+15%

8

10

4

-2

55

2:1

2

1

5.5

-12%

Total

72

46

25

+26

425

10:8

20

1

6.8

+18%

TSM Scoreboard Vertigo (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

11

14

4

-3

80

2:1

3

0

5.8

-11%

13

12

3

+1

64

1:2

1

0

5.8

-8%

9

13

5

-4

64

3:1

2

0

5.5

-11%

10

17

5

-7

66

2:1

1

0

5.3

-19%

3

16

3

-13

26

0:5

0

0

2.9

-58%

Total

46

72

20

-26

301

8:10

7

0

5.1

-21%

Teams advantage Vertigo (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of BIG vs TSM by the Bo3.gg Team

BIG on Vertigo Analysis

BIG demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for BIG on Vertigo were tabseN, who contributed 19 kills, and Krimbo, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 7641 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Vertigo, BIG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


TSM on Vertigo Analysis

Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for TSM, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for TSM on Vertigo included valde, who contributed 11 kills, and MoDo, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5415 total damage, TSM couldn't prevent BIG from securing victory on Vertigo


On the defensive side of Vertigo, TSM struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date