BIG Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

24

6

+2

88

3:1

8

0

6.5

+4%

23

25

4

-2

82

4:0

6

0

6.3

+9%

21

24

7

-3

61

4:7

2

0

5.6

-6%

22

26

9

-4

74

2:6

6

0

5.6

-12%

17

23

5

-6

57

3:5

3

2

5.3

-20%

Total

109

122

31

-13

362

16:19

25

2

5.9

-5%

Virtus.pro Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

31

23

6

+8

99

9:6

9

1

7.4

+15%

25

22

6

+3

85

5:2

6

0

6.7

+12%

31

26

4

+5

87

1:5

9

0

6.3

+26%

17

15

6

+2

52

2:0

3

0

5.4

-14%

16

23

4

-7

52

2:3

3

2

5.1

-20%

Total

120

109

26

+11

375

19:16

30

3

6.2

+4%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of BIG vs Virtus.pro by the Bo3.gg Team

Virtus.pro on Inferno Analysis

Virtus.pro demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 19 out of 35 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Virtus.pro on Inferno were YEKINDAR, who contributed 31 kills, and Qikert, who added 25 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 13128 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Virtus.pro held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


BIG on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for BIG, as they managed to secure 16 out of 35 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for BIG on Inferno included tabseN, who contributed 26 kills, and tiziaN, who added 23 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 12680 total damage, BIG couldn't prevent Virtus.pro from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, BIG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date