Cloud9 Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

13

3

+9

85

3:5

7

0

6.8

+13%

20

17

3

+3

82

3:4

7

1

6.6

+11%

18

14

3

+4

72

3:3

5

1

6.3

+8%

13

16

5

-3

71

1:2

3

3

6.0

-12%

15

14

4

+1

61

0:1

4

0

5.5

-7%

Total

88

74

18

+14

371

10:15

26

5

6.3

+2%

G2 Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

18

3

+1

91

2:0

2

0

6.7

+11%

15

15

5

0

71

6:1

4

0

6.6

-9%

17

19

2

-2

59

2:3

4

0

5.5

-21%

13

19

2

-6

57

2:2

3

0

5.1

-6%

10

18

0

-8

55

3:4

2

0

5.1

-28%

Total

74

89

12

-15

333

15:10

15

0

5.8

-10%

Teams advantage Anubis (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Cloud9 vs G2 by the Bo3.gg Team

Cloud9 on Anubis Analysis

Cloud9 demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Cloud9 on Anubis were sh1ro, who contributed 22 kills, and Hobbit, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 9273 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Cloud9 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


G2 on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for G2, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for G2 on Anubis included jks, who contributed 19 kills, and m0NESY, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8331 total damage, G2 couldn't prevent Cloud9 from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, G2 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date