EC Brugge Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

28

14

4

+14

124

3:1

7

1

8.3

+47%

22

11

2

+11

87

1:5

4

2

7.0

+24%

18

21

4

-3

87

2:2

6

0

6.2

+5%

16

17

3

-1

71

4:4

4

0

5.8

-3%

8

16

7

-8

44

0:3

1

0

4.3

-22%

Total

92

79

20

+13

413

10:15

22

3

6.3

+10%

GTZ Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

27

18

5

+9

100

4:1

7

0

7.8

+18%

14

17

1

-3

63

0:0

3

1

5.9

-2%

15

19

1

-4

67

1:2

2

0

5.5

-8%

12

18

5

-6

65

5:2

2

0

5.4

-6%

11

20

0

-9

49

5:5

2

0

4.7

-29%

Total

79

92

12

-13

344

15:10

16

1

5.9

-5%

Teams advantage Anubis (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of EC Brugge vs GTZ by the Bo3.gg Team

EC Brugge on Anubis Analysis

EC Brugge demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for EC Brugge on Anubis were Markoś, who contributed 28 kills, and swiiffter, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 10314 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, EC Brugge held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


GTZ on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for GTZ, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for GTZ on Anubis included Shr, who contributed 27 kills, and Jaepe, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8603 total damage, GTZ couldn't prevent EC Brugge from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, GTZ struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date