EC Brugge Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

21

7

+3

91

8:1

6

0

7.3

+15%

22

19

3

+3

71

2:3

4

1

6.4

+7%

17

16

4

+1

70

1:0

4

1

5.9

+11%

17

22

5

-5

70

2:3

4

0

5.4

-19%

16

22

5

-6

65

2:9

4

1

5.1

-9%

Total

96

100

24

-4

366

15:16

22

3

6.0

+1%

Sangal Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

19

7

+4

83

6:3

8

0

6.9

+3%

24

20

2

+4

88

3:2

6

0

6.7

+7%

20

20

3

0

82

3:2

6

0

6.3

+11%

17

20

9

-3

67

2:5

3

0

5.6

-11%

15

17

8

-2

45

2:3

3

0

5.3

-22%

Total

99

96

29

+3

366

16:15

26

0

6.1

-2%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of EC Brugge vs Sangal by the Bo3.gg Team

Sangal on Inferno Analysis

Sangal demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Sangal on Inferno were soulfly, who contributed 23 kills, and kyuubii, who added 24 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10969 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Sangal held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


EC Brugge on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for EC Brugge, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for EC Brugge on Inferno included matty, who contributed 24 kills, and Stev0se, who added 22 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10993 total damage, EC Brugge couldn't prevent Sangal from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, EC Brugge struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date