cowana Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

6

6

+16

124

3:1

6

1

9.2

+48%

14

11

2

+3

62

3:2

3

0

6.1

-1%

13

13

4

0

78

2:3

2

0

6.0

+16%

8

8

4

0

50

0:2

1

0

5.1

-14%

8

11

3

-3

43

2:3

0

0

4.9

-12%

Total

65

49

19

+16

358

10:11

12

1

6.3

+8%

EC Kyiv Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

15

11

1

+4

70

4:1

4

0

6.7

+6%

10

16

2

-6

52

1:2

2

0

4.8

-21%

7

16

3

-9

56

4:3

0

0

4.8

-26%

8

11

4

-3

44

0:1

2

0

4.8

-18%

8

13

2

-5

54

2:3

1

0

4.7

-21%

Total

48

67

12

-19

276

11:10

9

0

5.2

-16%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of cowana vs EC Kyiv by the Bo3.gg Team

cowana on Inferno Analysis

cowana demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for cowana on Inferno were Krimbo, who contributed 22 kills, and PANIX, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7514 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, cowana held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


EC Kyiv on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for EC Kyiv, as they managed to secure 5 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for EC Kyiv on Inferno included byr9, who contributed 15 kills, and Smash, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5797 total damage, EC Kyiv couldn't prevent cowana from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, EC Kyiv struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date