Copenhagen Flames Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

14

13

2

+1

55

1:1

3

1

5.9

-15%

14

18

3

-4

67

2:3

4

0

5.5

-14%

9

18

2

-9

65

2:3

2

0

4.8

-22%

9

20

2

-11

59

0:4

1

0

4.3

-31%

6

21

1

-15

40

1:6

1

0

3.5

-43%

Total

52

90

10

-38

285

6:17

11

1

4.8

-25%

BIG Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

11

3

+9

99

8:2

7

0

8.2

+29%

22

11

3

+11

92

2:2

5

0

7.6

+32%

20

9

0

+11

79

3:0

5

0

7.3

+24%

16

11

4

+5

71

1:2

5

1

6.7

+11%

12

11

4

+1

60

3:0

3

0

6.1

-6%

Total

90

53

14

+37

401

17:6

25

1

7.2

+18%

Teams advantage Nuke (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Copenhagen Flames vs BIG by the Bo3.gg Team

BIG on Nuke Analysis

BIG demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for BIG on Nuke were tabseN, who contributed 20 kills, and faveN, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 9220 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, BIG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Copenhagen Flames on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for Copenhagen Flames, as they managed to secure 7 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Copenhagen Flames on Nuke included regali, who contributed 14 kills, and raalz, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6563 total damage, Copenhagen Flames couldn't prevent BIG from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, Copenhagen Flames struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date