DETONA Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

16

1

+6

96

3:2

6

0

6.7

+21%

19

18

1

+1

94

2:4

5

0

6.4

-2%

15

21

3

-6

69

3:4

5

0

5.1

-13%

13

19

3

-6

62

1:3

2

0

4.9

-10%

7

15

2

-8

49

0:2

1

0

4.3

-25%

Total

76

89

10

-13

370

9:15

19

0

5.5

-6%

Bravos Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

29

14

2

+15

105

2:1

8

2

8.7

+29%

23

15

3

+8

91

5:2

8

2

7.4

+9%

14

17

5

-3

74

2:3

3

0

5.5

-11%

12

15

5

-3

60

4:2

2

0

5.5

-14%

11

15

5

-4

61

2:1

1

0

5.3

-16%

Total

89

76

20

+13

389

15:9

22

4

6.5

-1%

Teams advantage Nuke (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of DETONA vs Bravos by the Bo3.gg Team

Bravos on Nuke Analysis

Bravos demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Bravos on Nuke were Tuurtle, who contributed 29 kills, and JOTA, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 9347 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, Bravos held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


DETONA on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for DETONA, as they managed to secure 8 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for DETONA on Nuke included NikoM, who contributed 22 kills, and nqz, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8877 total damage, DETONA couldn't prevent Bravos from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, DETONA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date