ECLOT Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

29

23

2

+6

74

7:2

7

2

7.0

+9%

22

24

3

-2

64

3:6

7

0

5.6

+2%

17

26

9

-9

74

3:5

3

0

5.3

-9%

16

23

5

-7

53

4:3

4

0

5.1

-25%

17

28

6

-11

61

1:2

3

0

5.1

-22%

Total

101

124

25

-23

326

18:18

24

2

5.6

-9%

eSuba Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

32

17

8

+15

95

6:3

6

0

7.4

+32%

31

21

5

+10

88

3:1

7

0

7.2

+15%

22

22

7

0

75

2:4

7

0

6.0

+4%

20

21

6

-1

65

2:4

5

0

5.6

0%

19

21

5

-2

58

5:6

3

0

5.5

-7%

Total

124

102

31

+22

381

18:18

28

0

6.3

+9%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of ECLOT vs eSuba by the Bo3.gg Team

eSuba on Inferno Analysis

eSuba demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 19 out of 36 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for eSuba on Inferno were twist, who contributed 32 kills, and Blogg1s, who added 31 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 13724 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, eSuba held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


ECLOT on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for ECLOT, as they managed to secure 17 out of 36 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for ECLOT on Inferno included nbqq, who contributed 29 kills, and K1-FiDa, who added 22 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 11719 total damage, ECLOT couldn't prevent eSuba from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, ECLOT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date