0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Smoke thrown on a map
2315.0371
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:40s00:39s
HE damage (avg/round)
11.93.4
HE damage (avg/round)
16.13.4
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.22
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Teammate kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
56%
Mirage
50%
Overpass
45%
Ancient
40%
Inferno
13%
Nuke
0%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
56%
25
22
Mirage
50%
46
5
Overpass
45%
29
31
Ancient
60%
40
11
Inferno
54%
59
3
Nuke
0%
0
69
Anubis
0%
0
4
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Mirage
100%
1
0
Overpass
0%
1
0
Ancient
100%
1
2
Inferno
67%
3
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Anubis
0%
0
3
Info
Match analysis of ECLOT vs GODSENT by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ECLOT and GODSENT, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by ECLOT. The MVP of this match was anarkez.
ECLOT analytics
The team ECLOT secured 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ECLOT were anarkez contributed 22 kills and nbqq contributed 22 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10409 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ECLOT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
GODSENT analytics
The team GODSENT managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for GODSENT were RuStY contributed 17 kills and Plopski contributed 17 kills. 9473 of total damage by GODSENT could not prevent ECLOT from securing the victory
On the defensive side, GODSENT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
Comments