EC Kyiv Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

33

17

5

+16

111

4:2

8

0

8.1

+40%

22

20

6

+2

83

3:4

6

1

6.6

+9%

16

19

4

-3

63

3:4

4

1

5.5

-5%

13

18

6

-5

49

3:1

3

1

5.3

-20%

17

21

4

-4

59

0:5

4

0

4.7

-10%

Total

101

95

25

+6

365

13:16

25

3

6.1

+3%

Endpoint Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

23

3

-3

88

7:1

6

0

6.7

-4%

18

20

4

-2

70

3:0

2

1

6.1

-5%

22

23

3

-1

62

4:7

6

1

5.9

0%

17

19

4

-2

65

2:1

3

0

5.8

-11%

18

17

3

+1

71

0:4

4

0

5.6

+4%

Total

95

102

17

-7

356

16:13

21

2

6.0

-3%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of EC Kyiv vs Endpoint by the Bo3.gg Team

EC Kyiv on Inferno Analysis

EC Kyiv demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for EC Kyiv on Inferno were byr9, who contributed 33 kills, and Smash, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10590 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, EC Kyiv held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Endpoint on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Endpoint, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Endpoint on Inferno included BOROS, who contributed 20 kills, and ritchiEE, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10327 total damage, Endpoint couldn't prevent EC Kyiv from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Endpoint struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date