EC Kyiv Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

19

4

+4

103

4:0

4

0

7.5

+10%

18

16

6

+2

74

3:3

3

0

6.3

-2%

16

18

2

-2

74

4:3

5

0

6.3

-3%

13

19

6

-6

58

3:4

3

0

5.3

-21%

9

17

2

-8

38

1:1

3

0

4.4

-41%

Total

79

89

20

-10

346

15:11

18

0

6.0

-11%

Endpoint Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

27

14

3

+13

103

4:2

8

0

7.9

+27%

18

16

7

+2

78

2:2

4

1

6.4

+15%

19

16

3

+3

69

1:5

5

1

6.1

-4%

12

18

5

-6

64

1:3

0

0

5.2

-9%

13

18

7

-5

60

3:3

3

0

5.2

-20%

Total

89

82

25

+7

375

11:15

20

2

6.2

+2%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of EC Kyiv vs Endpoint by the Bo3.gg Team

Endpoint on Inferno Analysis

Endpoint demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Endpoint on Inferno were Nertz, who contributed 27 kills, and Surreal, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9746 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Endpoint held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


EC Kyiv on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for EC Kyiv, as they managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for EC Kyiv on Inferno included Kvem, who contributed 23 kills, and s4ltovsk1yy, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8998 total damage, EC Kyiv couldn't prevent Endpoint from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, EC Kyiv struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date