EC Kyiv Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

30

12

5

+18

123

1:2

9

1

8.6

+63%

18

20

5

-2

78

7:1

5

0

6.7

-5%

17

14

1

+3

57

3:2

3

0

6.0

-6%

17

20

5

-3

76

1:2

5

0

6.0

0%

14

18

4

-4

64

3:4

3

0

5.4

-6%

Total

96

84

20

+12

398

15:11

25

1

6.5

+9%

FATE Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

25

20

8

+5

99

2:0

7

0

7.3

+16%

17

19

3

-2

81

4:3

5

0

6.1

+2%

17

18

3

-1

65

1:3

5

0

5.4

-13%

14

19

6

-5

68

1:4

4

0

5.1

-8%

11

20

1

-9

49

3:5

3

0

4.7

-20%

Total

84

96

21

-12

362

11:15

24

0

5.7

-4%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of EC Kyiv vs FATE by the Bo3.gg Team

EC Kyiv on Inferno Analysis

EC Kyiv demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for EC Kyiv on Inferno were amster, who contributed 30 kills, and byr9, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10350 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, EC Kyiv held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


FATE on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for FATE, as they managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for FATE on Inferno included KalubeR, who contributed 25 kills, and niki1, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9404 total damage, FATE couldn't prevent EC Kyiv from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, FATE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date