EC Kyiv Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

26

10

4

+16

113

4:1

8

1

8.9

+42%

21

9

6

+12

90

4:2

5

0

7.6

+28%

21

11

5

+10

94

3:0

4

0

7.5

+34%

16

15

6

+1

86

2:2

5

0

6.3

+3%

12

13

8

-1

60

2:2

2

0

5.5

-8%

Total

96

58

29

+38

442

15:7

24

1

7.2

+20%

MASONIC Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

14

16

1

-2

67

1:2

3

2

6.0

-10%

15

21

0

-6

79

4:4

5

0

5.8

-12%

11

20

9

-9

76

0:2

2

0

5.4

-19%

11

19

6

-8

62

1:5

3

0

4.9

-21%

7

20

4

-13

43

1:2

2

0

4.1

-43%

Total

58

96

20

-38

328

7:15

15

2

5.3

-21%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of EC Kyiv vs MASONIC by the Bo3.gg Team

EC Kyiv on Inferno Analysis

EC Kyiv demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for EC Kyiv on Inferno were Kvem, who contributed 26 kills, and s4ltovsk1yy, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9722 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, EC Kyiv held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


MASONIC on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for MASONIC, as they managed to secure 6 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for MASONIC on Inferno included j3nsyy, who contributed 14 kills, and Tauson, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7215 total damage, MASONIC couldn't prevent EC Kyiv from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, MASONIC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date