EC Kyiv Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

29

23

4

+6

100

5:2

9

3

8.0

+29%

26

26

4

0

94

1:3

9

1

6.6

+8%

20

23

8

-3

81

5:3

5

0

6.4

-5%

13

25

8

-12

57

0:3

4

1

4.7

-24%

10

23

10

-13

55

0:6

1

0

4.4

-30%

Total

98

120

34

-22

387

11:17

28

5

6.0

-5%

Nemiga Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

29

20

8

+9

100

5:0

10

0

7.7

+17%

27

18

7

+9

103

1:6

7

0

6.9

+30%

21

18

11

+3

83

3:2

6

1

6.9

+9%

23

20

9

+3

87

4:3

6

0

6.6

+19%

19

23

6

-4

71

5:1

4

1

6.3

-5%

Total

119

99

41

+20

444

18:12

33

2

6.9

+14%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of EC Kyiv vs Nemiga by the Bo3.gg Team

Nemiga on Inferno Analysis

Nemiga demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Nemiga on Inferno were iDISBALANCE, who contributed 29 kills, and boX, who added 27 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 12885 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Nemiga held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


EC Kyiv on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for EC Kyiv, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for EC Kyiv on Inferno included amster, who contributed 29 kills, and uQlutzavr, who added 26 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 11227 total damage, EC Kyiv couldn't prevent Nemiga from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, EC Kyiv struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date