EC Kyiv Scoreboard Vertigo (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

21

6

+5

86

3:1

7

0

6.8

+19%

23

20

4

+3

88

3:2

8

0

6.6

+15%

20

16

5

+4

75

3:5

6

1

6.4

+3%

21

21

5

0

76

3:2

6

0

5.9

+9%

12

23

4

-11

47

4:4

1

0

4.6

-32%

Total

102

101

24

+1

372

16:14

28

1

6.1

+3%

Sharks Scoreboard Vertigo (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

27

20

9

+7

105

3:3

8

0

7.2

+16%

22

22

2

0

91

5:5

5

0

6.5

+25%

20

19

5

+1

68

1:3

4

0

5.8

-3%

16

19

0

-3

57

3:2

3

0

5.3

-9%

16

22

6

-6

69

2:3

3

0

5.2

-8%

Total

101

102

22

-1

390

14:16

23

0

6.0

+4%

Teams advantage Vertigo (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of EC Kyiv vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team

EC Kyiv on Vertigo Analysis

EC Kyiv demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for EC Kyiv on Vertigo were amster, who contributed 26 kills, and uQlutzavr, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 11165 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Vertigo, EC Kyiv held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Sharks on Vertigo Analysis

Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for Sharks, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Sharks on Vertigo included Lucaozy, who contributed 27 kills, and realziN, who added 22 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 11712 total damage, Sharks couldn't prevent EC Kyiv from securing victory on Vertigo


On the defensive side of Vertigo, Sharks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date