EC Kyiv Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

27

9

5

+18

142

4:1

8

3

10.0

+67%

19

10

0

+9

93

1:1

6

1

7.4

+38%

16

13

3

+3

94

2:1

4

0

7.0

+19%

17

12

1

+5

68

2:3

4

1

6.1

+5%

8

14

6

-6

58

2:3

2

0

5.1

-22%

Total

87

58

15

+29

455

11:9

24

5

7.1

+21%

yodagus Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

14

16

3

-2

82

2:2

3

0

6.1

+4%

15

16

2

-1

75

1:2

4

0

5.7

+27%

10

18

2

-8

57

2:2

3

0

4.9

-13%

10

19

0

-9

53

1:3

2

0

4.5

-25%

8

18

3

-10

50

3:2

2

0

4.4

-20%

Total

57

87

10

-30

318

9:11

14

0

5.1

-5%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of EC Kyiv vs yodagus by the Bo3.gg Team

EC Kyiv on Inferno Analysis

EC Kyiv demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for EC Kyiv on Inferno were s4ltovsk1yy, who contributed 27 kills, and Flarich, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9092 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, EC Kyiv held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


yodagus on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for yodagus, as they managed to secure 4 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for yodagus on Inferno included AcilioN, who contributed 14 kills, and LUMSEN, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6357 total damage, yodagus couldn't prevent EC Kyiv from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, yodagus struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date