Endpoint Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

13

19

3

-6

75

2:2

3

0

5.7

-18%

17

20

2

-3

76

1:7

4

0

5.3

-11%

8

17

0

-9

43

1:0

1

1

5.1

-34%

10

19

3

-9

65

2:2

1

0

5.0

-21%

9

19

6

-10

56

1:4

2

0

4.7

-24%

Total

57

94

14

-37

316

7:15

11

1

5.2

-22%

AGO Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

23

14

5

+9

109

5:0

6

0

8.1

+34%

19

10

7

+9

97

2:1

5

0

7.2

+35%

14

13

10

+1

81

5:2

3

1

7.0

+15%

22

9

5

+13

87

0:2

6

0

6.9

+27%

15

11

4

+4

73

3:2

4

0

6.2

+2%

Total

93

57

31

+36

447

15:7

24

1

7.1

+22%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Endpoint vs AGO by the Bo3.gg Team

AGO on Inferno Analysis

AGO demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for AGO on Inferno were F1KU, who contributed 23 kills, and leman, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9843 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, AGO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Endpoint on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Endpoint, as they managed to secure 6 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Endpoint on Inferno included CRUC1AL, who contributed 13 kills, and BOROS, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6947 total damage, Endpoint couldn't prevent AGO from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Endpoint struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date