Endpoint Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

29

16

1

+13

102

5:2

8

0

8.0

+29%

20

15

6

+5

85

0:2

6

0

6.5

+3%

21

15

7

+6

87

1:4

6

1

6.4

+20%

17

19

7

-2

70

2:2

2

0

5.7

+1%

14

18

5

-4

61

5:4

3

0

5.5

-1%

Total

101

83

26

+18

405

13:14

25

1

6.4

+11%

Coalesce Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

19

2

+3

90

5:0

5

1

7.0

+7%

18

22

3

-4

77

3:4

4

0

5.7

-2%

15

19

3

-4

63

1:0

3

0

5.5

-12%

15

22

5

-7

72

2:6

4

1

5.3

-12%

13

19

1

-6

47

3:3

3

1

5.0

-18%

Total

83

101

14

-18

349

14:13

19

3

5.7

-7%

Teams advantage Anubis (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Endpoint vs Coalesce by the Bo3.gg Team

Endpoint on Anubis Analysis

Endpoint demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Endpoint on Anubis were HeavyGod, who contributed 29 kills, and mhL, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 10928 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Endpoint held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Coalesce on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Coalesce, as they managed to secure 11 out of 27 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Coalesce on Anubis included AZUWU, who contributed 22 kills, and Gizmy, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9423 total damage, Coalesce couldn't prevent Endpoint from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, Coalesce struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date