Endpoint Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

29

18

8

+11

104

2:1

7

0

7.7

+23%

22

18

3

+4

69

6:4

4

0

6.5

+2%

20

20

7

0

73

2:2

4

0

6.0

0%

19

21

3

-2

61

5:2

6

1

6.0

-4%

12

21

8

-9

54

2:4

2

0

5.0

-17%

Total

102

98

29

+4

360

17:13

23

1

6.2

+1%

Sharks Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

25

21

5

+4

96

4:8

7

1

6.9

+12%

21

19

4

+2

60

3:3

4

2

6.3

+5%

21

22

4

-1

76

2:3

4

0

5.9

-6%

18

18

6

0

66

0:2

4

1

5.7

-3%

13

22

10

-9

56

4:1

1

0

5.5

-15%

Total

98

102

29

-4

354

13:17

20

4

6.1

-1%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of Endpoint vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team

Endpoint on Inferno Analysis

Endpoint demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Endpoint on Inferno were mezii, who contributed 29 kills, and CRUC1AL, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10812 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Endpoint held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Sharks on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Sharks, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Sharks on Inferno included Lucaozy, who contributed 25 kills, and realziN, who added 21 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10612 total damage, Sharks couldn't prevent Endpoint from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Sharks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date