eSuba Scoreboard Ancient (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

21

7

+3

88

5:1

6

0

6.9

+7%

19

21

2

-2

74

1:1

5

0

5.7

0%

14

17

4

-3

61

1:3

2

1

5.2

-10%

14

23

6

-9

60

3:3

3

0

5.1

-16%

11

19

7

-8

56

2:7

3

0

4.6

-20%

Total

82

101

26

-19

340

12:15

19

1

5.5

-8%

Enterprise Scoreboard Ancient (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

25

18

4

+7

92

3:2

8

0

6.9

+21%

24

16

7

+8

91

4:4

6

0

6.7

+22%

19

15

5

+4

83

3:2

4

2

6.7

+25%

18

16

4

+2

75

2:2

4

0

6.1

+5%

15

17

4

-2

63

3:2

5

0

5.6

-15%

Total

101

82

24

+19

404

15:12

27

2

6.4

+12%

Teams advantage Ancient (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of eSuba vs Enterprise by the Bo3.gg Team

Enterprise on Ancient Analysis

Enterprise demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 16 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Enterprise on Ancient were MATYS, who contributed 25 kills, and manguss, who added 24 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 10917 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Ancient, Enterprise held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


eSuba on Ancient Analysis

Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for eSuba, as they managed to secure 11 out of 27 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for eSuba on Ancient included Blogg1s, who contributed 24 kills, and sAvana1, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9190 total damage, eSuba couldn't prevent Enterprise from securing victory on Ancient


On the defensive side of Ancient, eSuba struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date