ex-8Ballers Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

6

7

+18

90

2:2

7

1

8.2

+45%

20

13

4

+7

100

2:2

7

0

7.4

+34%

19

11

3

+8

82

4:2

3

0

7.0

+33%

16

13

5

+3

89

3:2

4

0

6.5

+11%

11

10

10

+1

76

1:1

5

0

5.7

+1%

Total

90

53

29

+37

436

12:9

26

1

7.0

+25%

CAMO Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

15

19

2

-4

88

3:2

2

0

6.4

+8%

14

17

0

-3

70

2:3

4

0

5.8

-13%

11

17

2

-6

63

1:0

2

0

5.3

-16%

8

18

4

-10

63

1:0

1

0

5.0

-13%

5

19

3

-14

43

2:7

0

0

3.7

-31%

Total

53

90

11

-37

327

9:12

9

0

5.3

-13%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of ex-8Ballers vs CAMO by the Bo3.gg Team

ex-8Ballers on Inferno Analysis

ex-8Ballers demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for ex-8Ballers on Inferno were Mr Shark, who contributed 24 kills, and Prodigy, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9163 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, ex-8Ballers held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


CAMO on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for CAMO, as they managed to secure 5 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for CAMO on Inferno included Cyanide, who contributed 15 kills, and NikkeZ, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6869 total damage, CAMO couldn't prevent ex-8Ballers from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, CAMO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date