ex-ENEIDA Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

14

2

+8

112

7:1

4

0

8.2

+32%

17

14

2

+3

78

3:3

3

0

6.5

+2%

13

12

4

+1

67

3:0

2

0

6.3

+6%

12

14

1

-2

56

0:0

3

2

5.7

-16%

11

12

6

-1

77

1:3

3

0

5.5

-1%

Total

75

66

15

+9

389

14:7

15

2

6.4

+5%

DMS Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

15

3

+5

85

0:0

6

1

7.0

-6%

16

13

5

+3

84

3:1

3

0

6.7

+17%

9

17

5

-8

55

3:6

2

1

4.9

-15%

12

15

6

-3

51

1:4

2

0

4.9

-19%

9

15

7

-6

61

0:3

1

0

4.8

-19%

Total

66

75

26

-9

336

7:14

14

2

5.6

-8%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of ex-ENEIDA vs DMS by the Bo3.gg Team

ex-ENEIDA on Inferno Analysis

ex-ENEIDA demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for ex-ENEIDA on Inferno were munch, who contributed 22 kills, and kensizor, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8563 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, ex-ENEIDA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


DMS on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for DMS, as they managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for DMS on Inferno included kAlash, who contributed 20 kills, and AW, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7399 total damage, DMS couldn't prevent ex-ENEIDA from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, DMS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date