ex-Preasy Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

14

15

7

-1

79

2:1

4

0

5.9

+5%

16

15

3

+1

70

5:5

4

0

5.9

+4%

13

17

1

-4

68

1:2

1

0

5.2

-14%

12

13

3

-1

50

1:1

2

0

5.2

0%

9

17

7

-8

57

2:3

1

0

4.6

-20%

Total

64

77

21

-13

325

11:12

12

0

5.4

-5%

Zero Tenacity Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

13

2

+5

82

2:1

3

0

6.8

+16%

17

13

1

+4

80

3:1

5

0

6.5

+12%

17

14

4

+3

92

1:4

5

0

6.3

+8%

16

12

4

+4

67

2:1

4

0

5.9

+13%

9

12

3

-3

56

4:4

0

0

5.1

-17%

Total

77

64

14

+13

378

12:11

17

0

6.1

+7%

Teams advantage Nuke (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of ex-Preasy vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team

Zero Tenacity on Nuke Analysis

Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Nuke were Cjoffo, who contributed 18 kills, and simke, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 8700 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


ex-Preasy on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for ex-Preasy, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for ex-Preasy on Nuke included Kristou, who contributed 14 kills, and niko, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7479 total damage, ex-Preasy couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, ex-Preasy struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date