Fake Natty Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

28

20

6

+8

93

5:2

9

0

7.4

+17%

23

16

3

+7

69

6:2

2

1

6.7

+11%

19

20

9

-1

70

2:2

5

0

6.1

-4%

16

15

6

+1

70

1:3

4

1

5.9

-5%

8

24

5

-16

43

2:5

2

0

4.0

-38%

Total

94

95

29

-1

345

16:14

22

2

6.0

-4%

SINNERS Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

28

22

6

+6

111

5:3

9

1

7.7

+23%

24

15

5

+9

80

2:3

9

0

6.7

+26%

18

16

7

+2

65

1:3

3

1

5.7

-7%

13

20

4

-7

47

4:3

2

0

4.8

-26%

12

21

2

-9

42

2:4

2

0

4.6

-10%

Total

95

94

24

+1

344

14:16

25

2

5.9

+1%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Fake Natty vs SINNERS by the Bo3.gg Team

SINNERS on Inferno Analysis

SINNERS demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for SINNERS on Inferno were KWERTZZ, who contributed 28 kills, and beastik, who added 24 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10323 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, SINNERS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Fake Natty on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Fake Natty, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Fake Natty on Inferno included dumau, who contributed 28 kills, and nqz, who added 23 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10362 total damage, Fake Natty couldn't prevent SINNERS from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Fake Natty struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date