FaZe Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

19

3

+4

81

4:5

9

0

6.6

+3%

18

19

3

-1

73

5:3

6

1

6.2

-4%

19

17

7

+2

61

4:3

3

0

6.2

-9%

17

19

3

-2

70

1:1

5

0

5.7

-11%

8

20

10

-12

47

1:2

1

1

4.6

-27%

Total

85

94

26

-9

332

15:14

24

2

5.9

-9%

G2 Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

17

5

+7

93

3:2

7

0

7.0

+16%

19

13

3

+6

62

4:3

3

0

6.1

-4%

18

18

4

0

72

2:3

3

0

5.9

-9%

18

17

5

+1

65

2:3

4

0

5.8

-1%

13

21

7

-8

59

3:4

2

0

5.0

-8%

Total

92

86

24

+6

351

14:15

19

0

6.0

-1%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of FaZe vs G2 by the Bo3.gg Team

G2 on Inferno Analysis

G2 demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for G2 on Inferno were huNter, who contributed 24 kills, and m0NESY, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10181 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, G2 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


FaZe on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for FaZe, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for FaZe on Inferno included Twistzz, who contributed 23 kills, and rain, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9633 total damage, FaZe couldn't prevent G2 from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, FaZe struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date