Fiend Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

19

8

+2

89

3:3

7

1

6.5

+13%

28

22

2

+6

69

4:2

9

0

6.5

-3%

17

19

4

-2

60

0:1

7

1

5.4

-18%

14

22

10

-8

75

1:5

3

1

5.4

-9%

15

23

3

-8

55

3:6

2

0

5.0

-27%

Total

95

105

27

-10

348

11:17

28

3

5.8

-9%

GamerLegion Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

19

1

+7

88

4:3

8

2

7.3

+13%

23

19

6

+4

83

4:1

7

0

6.7

+11%

22

20

5

+2

82

5:2

7

0

6.6

0%

21

19

8

+2

77

3:2

4

0

6.5

+3%

12

20

6

-8

56

0:2

2

1

4.8

-20%

Total

104

97

26

+7

386

16:10

28

3

6.4

+1%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Fiend vs GamerLegion by the Bo3.gg Team

GamerLegion on Inferno Analysis

GamerLegion demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for GamerLegion on Inferno were RuStY, who contributed 26 kills, and Zero, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 11579 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, GamerLegion held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Fiend on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Fiend, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Fiend on Inferno included v1c7oR, who contributed 21 kills, and h4rn, who added 28 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10449 total damage, Fiend couldn't prevent GamerLegion from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Fiend struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date